AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) vs Beanstalk Compared

Last Updated on

CraftyTechie is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Elastic Beanstalk (EB) are two popular services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for deploying and managing applications. While both services are used for deploying and scaling applications, they have different use cases and functionalities.

Understanding the differences between these two services can help developers and organizations make informed decisions about which one to use for their specific needs.

What’s the Difference Between AWS Elastic Container Service & Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) is a fully-managed container orchestration service that allows users to run and scale Docker containers on AWS easily. ECS is designed to be highly scalable and flexible, allowing users to deploy and manage containers across multiple availability zones. It also integrates well with other AWS services, such as Elastic Load Balancing and Amazon CloudWatch, making it a popular choice for organizations already using AWS.

Elastic Beanstalk (EB), on the other hand, is a fully-managed platform as a service (PaaS) that allows users to deploy and manage web applications and services. EB abstracts away the underlying infrastructure and provides a simple interface for deploying and scaling applications. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a popular choice for developers who want to quickly deploy and manage their applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.

Comparison table of AWS Elastic Container Service vs Elastic Beanstalk

FeatureAWS Elastic Container Service (ECS)Elastic Beanstalk (EB)
Primary Use CaseContainer orchestration and management for Docker containersPlatform as a Service (PaaS) for deploying and managing web applications and services
Integration with AWSHigh integration with AWS services, such as EC2, ECR, and CloudWatchHigh integration with AWS services, such as EC2, RDS, and S3
Supported LanguagesDocker containersJava, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, Docker, Apache Tomcat, PHP, and Ruby on Rails
Deployment OptionsEC2 launch type,
Fargate launch type
Web Server Environment,
Worker Environment
Scaling OptionsManual scaling,
Automatic scaling
Manual scaling,
Automatic scaling,
Scheduled scaling
PricingPay per task and data transferPay per instance, data transfer, and additional charges for other AWS services
Performance MetricsCPU usage,
memory usage,
network usage,
disk I/O operations,
tasks running,
containers running,
services running
CPU usage,
memory usage,
network usage,
disk I/O operations,
instances running,
requests processed,
errors encountered
CustomizationGreater control over underlying infrastructureLimited control over underlying infrastructure
ProsScalability,
Integration with AWS services,
Flexible deployment options,
Cost-effective
Easy to use,
Flexible,
Cost-effective,
Scalable
ConsComplex configuration,
Limited portability,
Lack of control over underlying infrastructure
Limited control over underlying infrastructure, Less customizable,
Vendor lock-in

Article Highlights

  1. AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Elastic Beanstalk (EB) are popular services for deploying and managing applications on AWS, with different use cases and functionalities.
  2. ECS is a fully-managed container orchestration service that allows users to run and scale Docker containers on AWS. At the same time, EB is a fully-managed platform as a service (PaaS) for deploying and managing web applications and services.
  3. ECS provides more control over the underlying infrastructure and integrates well with other AWS services, making it ideal for organizations already using AWS.
  4. Elastic Beanstalk offers a simple interface for deploying and scaling applications, supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, and is perfect for developers who don’t want to worry about infrastructure management.
  5. Both ECS and Elastic Beanstalk provide robust scaling options, but Elastic Beanstalk offers more granular control over scaling policies and includes scheduled scaling.
  6. Elastic Beanstalk is generally more cost-effective for smaller applications, while Elastic Container Service is more cost-effective for larger and more complex applications.
  7. The choice between Elastic Beanstalk and Elastic Container Service depends on the user’s needs and requirements.
AWS Elastic Container Elastic Beanstalk

Overview

When it comes to deploying and managing applications on AWS, there are various services to choose from. AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Elastic Beanstalk are two popular options.

What is AWS Elastic Container Service

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) is a fully-managed container orchestration service that allows users to easily run, manage, and scale Docker containers on AWS. ECS is designed to work with other AWS services, such as EC2, ECR, and CloudWatch, making it a powerful tool for building and deploying containerized applications.

ECS allows users to define and manage clusters of EC2 instances that run Docker containers. Users can specify the number of tasks, which containers to run on which instances, and how to scale the cluster based on demand. ECS also provides integration with load balancers, making distributing traffic across multiple containers easy.

What is Elastic Beanstalk

Elastic Beanstalk is a fully-managed service that makes deploying and running applications on AWS easy. With Elastic Beanstalk, users can simply upload their application code, and Elastic Beanstalk will automatically handle the application’s deployment, scaling, and monitoring.

Elastic Beanstalk supports various application types, including Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, and Docker. Users can also choose from pre-configured platforms like Apache Tomcat, PHP, and Ruby on Rails.

Elastic Beanstalk provides a simple, easy-to-use interface for managing applications and integrates with other AWS services, such as EC2, RDS, and S3. It also provides built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, making it easy to track the performance of your application.

AWS Elastic Container Elastic Beanstalk

Related Articles on Elastic Beanstalk

Deployment

Deployment Options for ECS

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) provides multiple options for deploying containers. ECS allows users to deploy containers using the following deployment options:

  • EC2 launch type: This option allows users to deploy containers on a cluster of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. Users can choose to deploy containers on a single instance or across multiple instances in a cluster. This option provides more control over the underlying infrastructure and allows users to customize the environment for their containerized applications.
  • Fargate launch type: This option allows users to deploy containers without managing the underlying EC2 instances. Fargate provides a serverless experience for deploying containers, and users only need to specify their containers’ CPU and memory requirements. This option is ideal for users who want to focus on their applications rather than the infrastructure.

Deployment Options for Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides a simpler way to deploy applications. Elastic Beanstalk allows users to deploy applications using the following deployment options:

  • Web Server Environment: This option allows users to deploy applications on a web server environment. Elastic Beanstalk automatically provisions the necessary resources and manages the underlying infrastructure. Users only need to upload their application code, and Elastic Beanstalk takes care of the rest.
  • Worker Environment: This option allows users to deploy applications in a worker environment. Elastic Beanstalk automatically provisions the necessary resources and manages the underlying infrastructure. Users can run background tasks, such as processing messages from a queue or performing batch processing.

Comparing Deployment Options

When it comes to deployment options, ECS provides more flexibility and control over the underlying infrastructure. Users can choose to deploy containers on a cluster of EC2 instances or use the serverless Fargate launch type. On the other hand, Elastic Beanstalk provides a simpler way to deploy applications without managing the underlying infrastructure. Users can choose to deploy applications on a web server or worker environment.

ECS is ideal for users who want more control over the underlying infrastructure and need to customize the environment for their containerized applications. Elastic Beanstalk is ideal for users who want a simpler way to deploy applications without managing the underlying infrastructure.

Scaling

Scaling Options for ECS

ECS provides two scaling options: manual and automatic. Manual scaling allows users to manually adjust the number of containers running in a cluster. On the other hand, automatic scaling enables users to define scaling policies that automatically adjust the number of containers based on specific metrics, such as CPU utilization or memory usage.

Scaling Options for Elastic Beanstalk

Elastic Beanstalk provides three scaling options: manual, automatic, and scheduled. Manual scaling works similarly to ECS, allowing users to manually adjust the number of instances. Automatic scaling also works similarly to ECS, allowing users to define scaling policies based on specific metrics. Scheduled scaling allows users to define scaling policies that adjust the number of instances based on a schedule, such as during peak hours.

Comparing Scaling Options

ECS and Elastic Beanstalk provide manual and automatic scaling options, but Elastic Beanstalk provides scheduled scaling. This can be useful for applications that have predictable traffic patterns. Additionally, Elastic Beanstalk provides more granular control over scaling policies, allowing users to define scaling policies based on more specific metrics than ECS.

Scaling OptionsAWS Elastic Container ServiceElastic Beanstalk
Manual ScalingYesYes
Automatic ScalingYesYes
Scheduled ScalingNoYes

Both ECS and Elastic Beanstalk provide robust scaling options. Still, Elastic Beanstalk provides more granular control over scaling policies and includes scheduled scaling, making it a better option for applications with predictable traffic patterns.

Pricing

Pricing for ECS

AWS Elastic Container Service is priced based on the number of tasks equivalent to containers and the amount of data transferred in and out of the service. The pricing structure for ECS is as follows:

  • $0.005 per task per hour
  • $0.01 per GB transferred in
  • $0.01 per GB transferred out

There are no additional charges for using Amazon EC2 instances to run your containers.

Pricing for Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk pricing is based on the type and number of instances used to run your application and the amount of data transferred in and out of the service. The pricing structure for Elastic Beanstalk is as follows:

  • Free tier available for up to 750 hours per month
  • $0.015 per hour for each instance using
  • $0.12 per GB transferred in
  • $0.12 per GB transferred out

Additional charges may apply for using other AWS services, such as Amazon RDS or Amazon ElastiCache.

Comparing Pricing

When comparing pricing between ECS and Elastic Beanstalk, it is important to consider the specific needs of your application. If you are running a large number of containers, ECS may be the more cost-effective option due to its per-task pricing structure. However, if you require a more managed environment and do not need as much control over your infrastructure, Elastic Beanstalk may be a better choice.

Overall, both services offer competitive pricing and flexible options to meet the needs of a wide range of applications.

Performance

Performance Metrics for ECS

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) provides several metrics to monitor its performance. These metrics include CPU usage, memory usage, network usage, and disk I/O operations. ECS also provides the following:

  • Metrics for the number of tasks running
  • The number of containers running
  • The number of services running

These metrics are essential for monitoring the performance of ECS and identifying any bottlenecks or issues that may affect the application’s performance.

Performance Metrics for Elastic Beanstalk

Elastic Beanstalk also provides several metrics to monitor its performance. These metrics include CPU usage, memory usage, network usage, and disk I/O operations. Elastic Beanstalk also provides metrics for the number of instances running, the number of requests processed, and the number of errors encountered. These metrics are essential for monitoring the performance of Elastic Beanstalk and identifying any bottlenecks or issues that may affect the application’s performance.

Comparing Performance Metrics

When comparing the performance metrics of ECS and Elastic Beanstalk, it is essential to note that both services provide similar metrics for monitoring performance. However, ECS provides more detailed metrics for monitoring the performance of containers and services, while Elastic Beanstalk provides more detailed metrics for monitoring the performance of instances and requests.

In terms of performance, ECS provides more granular control over the performance of containers and services, allowing developers to optimize the performance of their applications. Elastic Beanstalk, on the other hand, provides a more straightforward approach to managing the performance of applications, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

Overall, both ECS and Elastic Beanstalk provide robust performance monitoring capabilities essential for ensuring the optimal performance of applications running on AWS.

Pros and Cons of AWS Elastic Container Service

Pros

AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) is a powerful tool for managing containerized applications. 

Here are some of its advantages:

  • Scalability: ECS can easily scale up or down as needed, making it a great choice for applications that experience spikes in traffic.
  • Integration with other AWS services: ECS is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as Elastic Load Balancing and Auto Scaling, making it easy to manage complex applications.
  • Flexible deployment options: ECS supports various deployment options, including rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary deployments, giving users the flexibility to choose the best option for their needs.
  • Cost-effective: ECS is a cost-effective option for container management, as users only pay for the resources they use.

Cons

While AWS ECS has many strengths, there are also some drawbacks to consider:

  • Complex configuration: Setting up and configuring ECS can require a deep understanding of containerization and AWS services.
  • Limited portability: ECS is tightly integrated with AWS, making moving applications to other cloud providers or on-premises environments difficult.
  • Lack of control over underlying infrastructure: ECS abstracts much of the underlying infrastructure, which can disadvantage users who need more control over their environment.

AWS Elastic Container Service is a powerful tool for managing containerized applications, but there may be better choices for some use cases.

Pros and Cons of Elastic Beanstalk

Pros

Elastic Beanstalk is a popular service that simplifies the deployment and management of applications. 

Here are some of the benefits of using Elastic Beanstalk:

  • Easy to Use: Elastic Beanstalk is easy to use, especially for developers new to AWS. It provides a simple and intuitive web interface that allows users to deploy and manage applications easily.
  • Flexible: Elastic Beanstalk supports various programming languages, frameworks, and platforms. It also allows users to customize their environments by providing access to the underlying resources.
  • Cost-Effective: Elastic Beanstalk is a cost-effective solution for deploying and managing applications. It eliminates the need for users to manage their infrastructure, which can be expensive and time-consuming.
  • Scalable: Elastic Beanstalk can automatically scale applications based on demand. It can also handle traffic spikes without downtime, ensuring that applications are always available.

Cons

While Elastic Beanstalk has many benefits, there are also some drawbacks that users should be aware of:

  • Limited Control: Elastic Beanstalk abstracts away many of the underlying infrastructure components, which can limit users’ control over their environments. This can disadvantage users who require fine-grained control over their resources.
  • Less Customizable: While Elastic Beanstalk allows users to customize their environments, it limits what can be customized. Users may need help configuring certain aspects of their environments, which can be frustrating.
  • Vendor Lock-In: Elastic Beanstalk is a proprietary service that is only available on AWS. This can disadvantage users who want to avoid vendor lock-in or prefer to use other cloud providers.

Elastic Beanstalk is a great solution for developers who want to deploy and manage applications quickly and easily. However, users should know its limitations and consider whether it is the right solution for their needs.

AWS Elastic Container Service vs Elastic Beanstalk: Uncovering the Differences Summary

In conclusion, both AWS Elastic Container Service and Elastic Beanstalk are excellent services offering different user benefits.

Elastic Beanstalk is a great choice for developers who want to deploy and manage their applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. It provides a simple, intuitive interface for deploying and scaling applications and supports various programming languages and frameworks.

On the other hand, Elastic Container Service is better suited for users who require more control over their infrastructure and want to manage their containers directly. It provides a highly scalable and flexible platform for running containerized applications and offers various integrations with other AWS services.

In terms of pricing, Elastic Beanstalk is generally more cost-effective for smaller applications, while Elastic Container Service is more cost-effective for larger and more complex applications.

Ultimately, the choice between Elastic Beanstalk and Elastic Container Service will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user. Both services have their strengths and weaknesses, and users should carefully evaluate their options before deciding.

Building Web Applications in AWS

This article is part of our series to make AWS easy. We love AWS, but let’s be honest. It isn’t effortless. It’s way too complicated. We’ve created this learning path to help level you up and onboard your PHP app quickly.

Did you find this article helpful?

Join the best weekly newsletter where I deliver content on building better web applications. I curate the best tips, strategies, news & resources to help you develop highly-scalable and results-driven applications.

Build Better Web Apps

I hope you're enjoying this article.

Get the best content on building better web apps delivered to you.